[Dar-libdar_api] Re: archive methods?

[Denis C. <dar...@fr...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Christian Neumann wrote:
| On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 16:22:50 +0200
| Denis Corbin <dar...@fr...> wrote:
|
|
|>any objections ? comments ? ;-)
|
| My two cents: I would prefer a more object oriented API, because OO
| programming is more convenient.. Of course it would be difficult for a C
| programmer to understand the API, but at last it's a C++ library and not
| a C library. And you can't use libdar in C programs, can you (correct me
| if I'm wrong)? Non-OO C++ is just worse than plain C (IMHO).

that makes sens. So it we will go this way.

|
| Regards,
| Christian

Cheers,
Denis.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFA+Um8pC5CI8gYGlIRAvwBAJ44il9f3jYMv9U4RW08B9CaM8PTdQCgrf1h
D9fvinB5BUK0IjOEUT8iSHY=
=F0Dc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----