Re: [Dacco-users] geek/nerd
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
loxnard
From: Gill M. <gil...@ya...> - 2005-06-28 20:01:41
|
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Linda Oxnard wrote:<br> <sniparooni><br> <blockquote cite="mid...@ma..." type="cite"> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">I'm a bit wary of this, unless a geek can mean someone who is obsessed with video games/online chatrooms etc, without having any knowledge of computers. If it means this to you then I hereby back off and agree :-) </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""><!----> No, I don't think so. I think the knowledge of computers is necessary. </pre> </blockquote> This is why I didn't like the "computer-addict" translation. You can spend 24/7 playing whatever games they play online while knowing doodlesquit about how the things work.<br> <blockquote cite="mid...@ma..." type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Maybe it's because 'nerd' has, as you mentioned, a sense of 'no social life' / 'inability to interact with other people' attached to it... Who knows?! I think I'll now bow out of this debate here as it's obviously extraordinarily complex and nuanced and I'm not sure my intuition is 100% trustworthy.</pre> </blockquote> Mine tampoc. Jonathan prefers to be called a nerd, because to him that implies a higher level of competence. But obviously he lacks seny, whatever that may be.<br> </body> </html> |