Re: [cssed-devel] Changed accelerator in Document

[<mic...@ea...>]

Le 19 f=E9vr. 2005, =E0 12:45, Iago Rubio a =E9crit :

> On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 18:41, Mich=E8le Garoche wrote:
>> I've also integrated comments in header for plugindoc, to avoid
>> reinvent the wheel.
>
> I didn't do it because the plugin's headers are not meant to be =
exactly
> the same as the application headers.
>
> Some functions are taken out for convenience, because are not ready to
> be public, and expose internall functions not needed for plugin's
> development.
>
> That's why there's a separated set of headers distributed in the=20
> include
> directory for external developers. Are not exactly the same - or=20
> better,
> are not meant to be the same - as the internally used ones.
>
> Of course the functions that appears in the plugin's headers are=20
> exactly
> the same on the application's headers.
The doxygen file hides those internal functions, so that should be not=20=

a problem, or maybe I don't understand exactly what you mean.

Mich=E8le
<http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>