Re: [cssed-devel] Format of documentation
Brought to you by:
iagorubio
From: Iago R. <iag...@hi...> - 2005-02-11 18:55:24
|
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 17:52, Mich=C3=A8le Garoche wrote: > Le 11 f=C3=A9vr. 2005, =C3=A0 17:48, Iago Rubio a =C3=A9crit : >=20 > > On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 11:22, Mich=C3=A8le Garoche wrote: > >> Le 11 f=C3=A9vr. 2005, =C3=A0 11:17, Iago Rubio a =C3=A9crit : > >> > >>> On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 06:19, Mich=C3=A8le Garoche wrote: [snip] > > Saxon have not even packages for Linux but a zip, and is not in the=20 > > most > > common distros. > Java is free, Saxon is free. Java is free as beer, but not as speech. Saxon depends on Java :) > > Are there other free software options avaiable ? > For pdf output, no. We should stuck in the old format then. I will not ask to install a non open source package, for building docs. All should be free - as speech - from the ground up. At least upstream build scripts should depend only on open source packages. If it exists the posibility of improve something with non open source tools, great. But I will not distribute packages with such dependencies. At least not in the cssed project's page. May be I could do it in my personal page, but only as an alternative. Regards. --=20 Iago Rubio =20 - Home page * http://www.iagorubio.com=20 - Last project * http://cssed.sourceforge.net =20 - GPG Keyserv * pgp.rediris.es id=3D0x909BD4DD |