Re: [cssed-devel] Format of documentation

[<mic...@ea...>]

Le 11 f=E9vr. 2005, =E0 17:48, Iago Rubio a =E9crit :

> On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 11:22, Mich=E8le Garoche wrote:
>> Le 11 f=E9vr. 2005, =E0 11:17, Iago Rubio a =E9crit :
>>
>>> On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 06:19, Mich=E8le Garoche wrote:
>>>> I know you are not pro that, but would you mind if I change the=20
>>>> format
>>>> of doc from sgml to xml, as sgml is quite stagnant, not to mention=20=

>>>> the
>>>> dssl stysheets.
>>>>
>>>> It makes outputs more and more ugly, compared to what can be done=20=

>>>> with
>>>> xml/xsl/css for all formats: ps, pdf, html.
>>>>
>>>> This way, I can use docbook-dtd 4.4 and all its possibilities.
>>>
>>> Will we use the jade transformation engine on the new format ?
>> No, xslt stylesheets and saxon parser. Jade is really way out of =
date.
>
> This will add a bad dependency to build the docs, that's Java.
>
> I don't like to add a dependency to a non free package to build the
> docs.
>
> Saxon have not even packages for Linux but a zip, and is not in the=20
> most
> common distros.
Java is free, Saxon is free.

>
> Are there other free software options avaiable ?
For pdf output, no.

Mich=E8le
<http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>