Re: [cssed-devel] Format of documentation
Brought to you by:
iagorubio
From: Iago R. <iag...@hi...> - 2005-02-11 16:48:12
|
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 11:22, Mich=C3=A8le Garoche wrote: > Le 11 f=C3=A9vr. 2005, =C3=A0 11:17, Iago Rubio a =C3=A9crit : >=20 > > On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 06:19, Mich=C3=A8le Garoche wrote: > >> I know you are not pro that, but would you mind if I change the format > >> of doc from sgml to xml, as sgml is quite stagnant, not to mention the > >> dssl stysheets. > >> > >> It makes outputs more and more ugly, compared to what can be done with > >> xml/xsl/css for all formats: ps, pdf, html. > >> > >> This way, I can use docbook-dtd 4.4 and all its possibilities. > > > > Will we use the jade transformation engine on the new format ? > No, xslt stylesheets and saxon parser. Jade is really way out of date. This will add a bad dependency to build the docs, that's Java. I don't like to add a dependency to a non free package to build the docs. Saxon have not even packages for Linux but a zip, and is not in the most common distros. Are there other free software options avaiable ? --=20 Iago Rubio =20 - Home page * http://www.iagorubio.com=20 - Last project * http://cssed.sourceforge.net =20 - GPG Keyserv * pgp.rediris.es id=3D0x909BD4DD |