Re: [cssed-devel] package vaersions
Brought to you by:
iagorubio
From: Iago R. <iag...@hi...> - 2004-03-10 09:06:29
|
El mar, 09 de 03 de 2004 a las 20:37, Jeremy Guarini escribi=C3=B3: > OK Iago, I now understand the packaging system and idea that you have. > Thanks for helping me. You're welcome :) For others in the list: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Jeremy, On 09 03 2004 00:41, Jeremy Guarini wrote > Hi,=20 > I have a question about the package versions. I see that there is > cssed-pre0.1.5 and then there is cssed-0.2.0, now will the 0.2.0 be > considered not alpha/beta? It seems that the devs over at Gentoo who > maintain the portage see the the pre in the version name and mask the > application, thus the need to specifically emerge the package. If the > pre is not in the name as is the case for the 0.2.0 version they will > probably remove the mask. > Just let me know what is going on with this.=20 I'm taking out the "pre" because it's causing lots of problems to other packagers. As example the redhat package was named cssed-0.1.2pre-1.rpm. Most applications are not using the project state string (betha, alpha or pre) in the package names, so I finally will drop it from cssed's package name. BTW the "pre" was first used as "pre-beta" but the "beta" was taken out because it makes the name too long.=20 Most distros take the "pre" as "pre-release" that's not the cssed's state. ( My fault ;) So from this point the project state will not be in the cssed's package name. Next release - first beta - will be 0.2.0, it will be only numeric and grow incrementally to ease packaging. > Also, should I add an ebuild for the 0.2.0 version now or hold off until > later? What I posted is a snapshot of the new release 0.2.0. The release will be this package, with some corrections, and a new CSS dialog (box properties). So please wait a little to upload the ebuild. ITOH you can make the ebuild, as the building proccess will be the same in the release package.=20 Now it's time to see the lacks of this package, and to ask to add new features or fix bugs and/or anoyances, in the current package :) The release date will be decided in the list. At least, once the package will be finished we must wait a some days for the translators ( Michele and me ;) to update the po files. I will post this message in the list as I know this question will be asked again there. Best regards.=20 --=20 Iago Rubio http://www.iagorubio.com =20 GPGkey pgp.rediris.es id 0x909BD4DD fingerprint =3D D18A B950 5F03 BB9A DD89 AA75 FEDF 1978 909B D4DD ********** iago.rubio(AT)hispalinux.es ********** =20 -------------------------------------------------- |