From: Philip W. <phi...@gm...> - 2011-12-31 13:59:51
|
On Sat, 2011-12-31 at 14:42 +0100, res wrote: > On 31.12.2011 06:45, Philip Wyett wrote: > > I have also updated the CS site for both the 2.0 beta and trunk. The > > packages marked 2.1. Should they not be removed to avoid confusion? > > I don't like removing package versions... > they might turn out to be still useful (e.g. there may be a bug in the > new version, but it doesn't occur with the older version...) > > WRT confusion: possibly. But generally I tell people to look for the > winlibs version mentioned in the manual; so for trunk this would also > point to 2.0_002. Besides, I could also do something like releasing a > 2.1_002, that would probably solve any confusion potential. This is what I did in the early of hours of this morning for trunk on the CS site. Pointed at the exact version rather than what it was doing and linking to the whole folder of packages. Regards Phil |