From: David P. <pl...@mi...> - 2007-06-28 12:31:22
|
Hi all, I looked at yesterday's proposal by Lemuel on the aptitudes for the single dwarf race that might emerge from HD and MD. With most of the decisions I completely agree but some I would like to discuss. For the latter, I added a line below (when nothing's in a column from me, I vote for Lemuel's value). Some numbers may be wrong due to a) the tables.txt being wrong or b) me having put Lemuel's number wrong. Arm Ddg Sth Stb Shd T&D Inv Evo Exp --------------------------------------------------------------------- Hill Dwarf 70 120 150 140 70 100 100 60 140 Mountain Dwarf 60 110 140 130 70 100 100 70 140 Lemuel 60 110 150 130 70 100 75 50 140 David 100 60 Fgt SBl LBl Axs M&F Pla Stv U C Ran Slg Bws Crb Drt --------------------------------------------------------------------- Hill Dwarf 70 80 80 60 70 110 130 100 120 130 150 120 120 Mountain Dwarf 70 90 90 70 70 110 120 100 115 125 140 100 120 Lemuel 70 80 90 65 70 110 120 100 120 120 150 90 120 David Spc Coj Enc Sum Nec Trl Trm Div Fir Ice Air Ear Poi --------------------------------------------------------------------- Hill Dwarf 160 120 150 150 160 150 120 130 80 120 150 70 130 Mountain Dwarf 140 115 135 150 160 150 120 130 70 130 150 70 130 Lemuel 200 120 150 150 160 150 120 130 70 125 150 70 130 David 160 130 The change to Ice doesn't matter, of course. Note for Spc that the tables.txt is missing a factor (I'll change that). I know the aim behind Evo 50 but feel it might get too strong. Why Inv 75? Concerning the name, I vote for 'Mountain Dwarf'. I like a compound better than plain 'Dwarf', we might want to add monster dwarves (for example by way of 'Deep Dwarf') and MD compares better to HO than HD, I think. Good bye! David |