Menu

#756 Gaze attacks & Invisibility

closed
nobody
None
4
2009-12-09
2007-09-14
Megane
No

What if gaze attacks couldn't be used if you were invisible?

Currently, I don't find much point to using invisibility, and this seems like it could be a logical and useful perk.

And a way of dealing with giant eyes, eyes of draining, shining eyes without res mut.

Eyes of devastation could still attack, as their attack doesn't seem like something they'd really need to see you for.

Thoughts?

Discussion

  • jpeg

    jpeg - 2007-09-15

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=1738447
    Originator: NO

    Well, all eyes except the giant eyeball have M_SEE_INVIS, which sort of makes sense (keen eyesight and all that). The eyeball exception is probably there to be nice.

     
  • jpeg

    jpeg - 2008-05-23
    • priority: 5 --> 1
     
  • jpeg

    jpeg - 2008-05-23

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=1738447
    Originator: NO

    Something about eyes might have to be changed, but invisibility doesn't really make a lot of sense. Dropping priority in preparation for closing this.

     
  • dpeg

    dpeg - 2008-12-23
    • priority: 1 --> 4
     
  • Eino Keskitalo

    Eino Keskitalo - 2009-08-16

    I actually like this. Would be nice for the proposed basilisk with petrifying gaze as well. I'd like it more if the eyes were "weak" than "strong" against invisibility, it would be very flavourful and it would be something that the player *could* do instead of being something what the player *couldn't* do against them.

    --Eino

     
  • doy

    doy - 2009-12-09
    • status: open --> closed
     

Log in to post a comment.

MongoDB Logo MongoDB