[Crackerjack-users 00046] Re: [LTP] Crackerjack and Linux Test Project

[Masatake Y. <ya...@re...>]

> Oh Yes. You are correct. I did not look in to that aspect at all. I just did
> a comparison of whatever we have at *testcases/kernel/syscalls* and what
> they have in *Crackerjack*. I am listing down my comments here:
> 
> 1) ftruncate64
> Comments: We have ftruncate at *testcases/kernel/syscalls/ftruncate/*. But
> this may not be doing the ftruncate64() test. You may need to include/port
> ftruncate64 on similar lines to sendfile64 and fadvise64.

How do you think add this list to ltp source tree?
The list should be kept untill we complete the porting.
This list may be helpful to avoid conflicts between contributors who
wants to port testcases.

Here is the update:

    76) gettid
    Comments: We need this from Crackerjack as we do not have this in LTP
    anywhere. (Done by Masatake YAMATO <ya...@re...>).