Re: [Cpufreqd-user] nice & script-programs
Brought to you by:
mattia-san
From: Mattia D. <mal...@gm...> - 2005-06-23 09:11:36
|
Hello sorry for the late reply... On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 04:47:25AM +0200, Sven K?=AB=D3hler wrote: > Hi, >=20 > i've got two things that i'd like to do with cpufreqd, but it doesn't > seem to be possible: >=20 > 1. niced processes aren't counted as much as normal processes. So having > a cpu-usage of 100% with almost 99% niced, cpu_interval 75-100 will not > match. In the archives, i read about a new paramter called idle_scale > (which should better be called nice_scale). Which version does support > this switch? and am i too blind to find that in the man-page of cpufreqd > 1.2.2? oh well... that parameter is not considered yet... sorry for being that lazy, I'm still wondering when I'll be able to release a new version of cpufreqd with all that changes > 2. i'm using Gentoo and gentoo's package-management-tool is emerge. > Putting "programs=3Demerge" in the config doesn't help much, since emerge > is a script and a "ps aux" shown "/usr/bin/python -O /usr/bin/emerge" > rather than "/usr/bin/emerge" - thouhg pstree lists it as "emerge". Of > course i don't want all python-scripts to set my CPU to full speed. How > can i define a rule which mathes if emerge is running? current cpufreqd looks at the content of /proc/<PID>/cmd and matches against that. Increasing the verbosity of cpufreqd (-V7) can also help finding out if cpufreqd is matching the configured command string against the cmd content. Really, be patient, newer cpufreqd is almost there... (How many times will I say it before releasing actually? :)) --=20 mattia :wq! |