Re: [Cppunit-devel] Release 1.8.0 ?
Brought to you by:
blep
From: Steve M. R. <ste...@vi...> - 2001-10-19 01:59:19
|
Hi all, I discovered that cppunit 1.6.1 won't install properly on a system that lacks "doxygen". So I started a 1.6 branch in CVS and committed the fix. I'll make a 1.6.2 release on the weekend if I get time. Is there anything else that ought to be addressed? To get the 1.6 branch, I'd suggest finding a clean spot and doing a new checkout. You need to give the "-r BRANCH_1_6" option to cvs: cvs -d xx...@cv...:/cvsroot/cppunit \ checkout -r BRANCH_1_6 -d cppunit-1.6branch cppunit Remember that commits in that directory will go on the BRANCH_1_6 branch, *not* on the main trunk. On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 02:21:38PM +0200, Baptiste Lepilleur wrote: > Well, there a load of new stuffs... If everything is ok on the > Unix side, we should try for the release, no ? Eh, well I can build it and "make check" reports no failures (104 tests), so things look good on the unix side. That's only one platform (Linux), mind you. Since we've recently run into problems with Solaris compilers, it would be nice if a Solaris person would test things out. Any takers? We could make a 1.7.0 tarball as a snapshot of the current development tree -- would that help? > What do you think Steve ? I don't understand what you've done! :-) I'm getting a bit worried that the "test runner" stuff is getting out of hand. Once upon a time I posted a sketch of how to rework the classes to (in my view) drastically simplify the "runner" code and make it trivial to implement output by writing a simple "listener" class. See http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/6780/2001/7/0/6126118/ What do you think of the proposals contained therein? How have your recent changes modified this? And there is also the issue of TestCaller versus fixtures, c.f. the thread starting from http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/6780/2001/7/0/6126116/ I'd really like to have this cleaned up for 1.8. And hopefully I'd be able to understand CppUnit well enough to write some documentation ... On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 05:14:48PM +0200, Baptiste Lepilleur wrote: > > I contacted Ron, we are now referenced on: > > http://www.xprogramming.com/software.htm > > Which list "all" know Unit testing framework. Thanks for that! -S -- by Rocket to the Moon, by Airplane to the Rocket, by Taxi to the Airport, by Frontdoor to the Taxi, by throwing back the blanket and laying down the legs ... - They Might Be Giants |