Re: [Cppunit-devel] Re: [ cppunit-Bugs-464844 ] Comp. warnings & errors - rel 1.6.0
Brought to you by:
blep
|
From: Baptiste L. <bl...@cl...> - 2001-09-30 18:46:48
|
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve M. Robbins" <ste...@vi...>
To: "CppUnit Development" <cpp...@li...>
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Cppunit-devel] Re: [ cppunit-Bugs-464844 ] Comp. warnings &
errors - rel 1.6.0
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone find the doxygen-generated manpages to be useful, or do
> you use the HTML docs exclusively? The issue is this: it is a bit
> of a nuisance to get the manpages installed correctly, so 1.6.1
> will not install them, though it does install the HTML. I don't find
> the manpages useful, so I won't make the effort to install them unless
> other folks want it. Let me know!
HTML only for me ;-). It's hard to get away with C++ without looking at
the "neighbor" classes. The advanced linking facility of Doxygen really help
with that.
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 04:29:28PM +0200, Baptiste Lepilleur wrote:
>
> > I don't remember the rules. I'm sure I read something about it
somewhere.
> > An alternative would be to move the nested class declaration to
> > CPPUNIT_TEST_SUITE where the type is explicit available as a macro
> > parameter. In fact I just did that (comitted).
>
> Brilliant. I expect that will work.
>
> Thanks for the contrib/msvc files. I modifed the makefile to put them
> into the distribution. Once you've cvs-added and cvs-committed your
> FAQ file, I think we are ready to release 1.6.1. Let me know if there
> is something you want to put in.
Oops, forgot to add and commit. Should be done when you get the mail.
Baptiste.
|