Re: [Cppunit-devel] Re: [ cppunit-Bugs-464844 ] Comp. warnings & errors - rel 1.6.0
Brought to you by:
blep
From: Baptiste L. <bl...@cl...> - 2001-09-30 18:46:48
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve M. Robbins" <ste...@vi...> To: "CppUnit Development" <cpp...@li...> Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 7:57 PM Subject: Re: [Cppunit-devel] Re: [ cppunit-Bugs-464844 ] Comp. warnings & errors - rel 1.6.0 > Hi all, > > Does anyone find the doxygen-generated manpages to be useful, or do > you use the HTML docs exclusively? The issue is this: it is a bit > of a nuisance to get the manpages installed correctly, so 1.6.1 > will not install them, though it does install the HTML. I don't find > the manpages useful, so I won't make the effort to install them unless > other folks want it. Let me know! HTML only for me ;-). It's hard to get away with C++ without looking at the "neighbor" classes. The advanced linking facility of Doxygen really help with that. > On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 04:29:28PM +0200, Baptiste Lepilleur wrote: > > > I don't remember the rules. I'm sure I read something about it somewhere. > > An alternative would be to move the nested class declaration to > > CPPUNIT_TEST_SUITE where the type is explicit available as a macro > > parameter. In fact I just did that (comitted). > > Brilliant. I expect that will work. > > Thanks for the contrib/msvc files. I modifed the makefile to put them > into the distribution. Once you've cvs-added and cvs-committed your > FAQ file, I think we are ready to release 1.6.1. Let me know if there > is something you want to put in. Oops, forgot to add and commit. Should be done when you get the mail. Baptiste. |