Member variable "" is not initialized in the constructor.

[DarrenSong]

the member variable is initialized in the constructor, but it still report this error .pls see the detail as below.
DunleeCT8000StateContext::DunleeCT8000StateContext()//:mDuleeXsegmentDev(NULL)<--- Member variable 'DunleeCT8000StateContext::mDuleeXsegmentDev' is not initialized in the constructor.
{
m_DuleeXsegmentDev = NULL;
m_StopShotCallBack=boost::function<void ()="">();
m_dfu_comm_send_suc=false;
m_fila_comm_send_suc=false;
}
i want to know how to fix it or if it is a bug?. cppcheck version is v2.8</void>

[CHR]

I can't reproduce the issue for

DunleeCT8000StateContext::DunleeCT8000StateContext() {
    m_DuleeXsegmentDev = NULL;
    m_StopShotCallBack=boost::function<void()>();
    m_dfu_comm_send_suc=false;
    m_fila_comm_send_suc=false;
}

[Daniel Marjamäki]

please show the declaration for m_DuleeXsegmentDev

[DarrenSong]

the class definition is below
class DunleeCT8000StateContext {
public:
funtion1();
funtion2();
...
funtionn();
private:
IDunleeXrayDevice* m_DuleeXsegmentDev

};

[Daniel Marjamäki]

I think a small code example would be good so we can reproduce. I assume 7-8 lines of code is enough. Can you reproduce with:

class DunleeCT8000StateContext {
private:
    // Declaration for m_DuleeXsegmentDev here
public:
    DunleeCT8000StateContext() {
        m_DuleeXsegmentDev = NULL;
    }
};

[DarrenSong]

i reproduce with your code,it does not report this error, thanks a lot.
but i wander why cause this cause?

[Daniel Marjamäki]

I assume there is a detail in your code that confuses Cppcheck. I would suggest that you reduce your code to find out why Cppcheck writes a false positive.