After creating this, CPPCheck was able to identify if a variable of type PtrType1 or PtrType2 was unused.
Both PtrType1 and PtrType2 is a define based on the "unsigned char*".
Their only difference is the range of values they can accomodate.
However, is it also possible for CPPCheck to flag an error/warning for the scenario below?
To flag a warning regarding the implicit conversion of one pointer to another would be nice. This is so that CPPCheck can help us in our manual checking of the usage of these 2 pointers. I would also like for CPPCheck to be able to flag a warning if the call to func1() happens to be:
func1((PtrType1)ptrvar);
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Hello,
I created the ff. configuration file:
<def> <podtype name="PtrType1" sign="u" size="2"/> <podtype name="PtrType2" sign="u" size="3"/> </def>After creating this, CPPCheck was able to identify if a variable of type PtrType1 or PtrType2 was unused.
Both PtrType1 and PtrType2 is a define based on the "unsigned char*".
Their only difference is the range of values they can accomodate.
However, is it also possible for CPPCheck to flag an error/warning for the scenario below?
void func1(PtrType1 param1)
{
//function body...
}
int main()
{
PtrType2 ptrvar;
ptrvar = <some value="">;
func1(ptrvar);
return 0;
}
To flag a warning regarding the implicit conversion of one pointer to another would be nice. This is so that CPPCheck can help us in our manual checking of the usage of these 2 pointers. I would also like for CPPCheck to be able to flag a warning if the call to func1() happens to be:
func1((PtrType1)ptrvar);