I am thinking about renaming --verify to --bug-hunting or something like that.
I have the feeling that Verification is a academic term that kind of means something else. There is for instance a competition https://sv-comp.sosy-lab.org/2020/
In my opinion the test cases are not designed as I think they should. It's like the Juliet test cases.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Do you think it is useful to add --bug-hunting to the daca@home client?
There are only extra checks if I understand it correctly, so I guess it should be OK.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I don't know if I am happy about --bug-hunting neither. Maybe something like --sound and say that this will turn on "sound" analysis. I just don't think "sound" means anything to many users. Any better ideas?
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Do you think it is useful to add --bug-hunting to the daca@home client?
I fixed some crashes. I think it should be added soonish. Feel free to add it if you want.
However the syntax is not really stable (compilation options, commandline options) at the moment. That is something I'll have to consider when I continue developing it..
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Do you have some opinions?
I am thinking about renaming
--verifyto--bug-huntingor something like that.I have the feeling that
Verificationis a academic term that kind of means something else. There is for instance a competition https://sv-comp.sosy-lab.org/2020/In my opinion the test cases are not designed as I think they should. It's like the Juliet test cases.
I will rename it. It feels better with a different name so it's not confused with the academic term.
Do you think it is useful to add
--bug-huntingto the daca@home client?There are only extra checks if I understand it correctly, so I guess it should be OK.
Yes. I have started running it on some projects and it crashes too easily.
I don't know if I am happy about
--bug-huntingneither. Maybe something like--soundand say that this will turn on "sound" analysis. I just don't think "sound" means anything to many users. Any better ideas?I fixed some crashes. I think it should be added soonish. Feel free to add it if you want.
However the syntax is not really stable (compilation options, commandline options) at the moment. That is something I'll have to consider when I continue developing it..