Old Trac server is down

[Daniel Marjamäki]

We are getting a new Trac server. The http://trac.cppcheck.net will point at the new server within 24 hours. Until then you can use this address: http://cppcheck1.osuosl.org

Initially, https will not work. I will look into that asap.

The old trac server is down now. It will be deleted soonish.

[versat]

In case you did not know already:
The new Trac installation is missing a bash processor:

Error: Failed to load processor bash
No macro or processor named 'bash' found

You can see this error for example in some comments in the ticket http://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/9354

[versat]

Code highlighting for C/C++ also does not seem to work.
But at least the code is shown correctly, but without color.

[Paul Fultz]

It seems I can't log in. It says Authentication information not available. Please refer to the installation documentation..

Also, it seems out of date. I made several changes to several tickets yesterday and those changes are gone.

[Daniel Marjamäki]

The new server is not working well. I got unexpected problems. :-(

The trac database from the old server should be intact still so all changes to that should be available. But any changes you make right now in the new Trac might be lost. It is not robust yet. I advice that you do not try to use it yet.

If anybody can help me with the trac please feel free ...
Here is a trac.log output: https://pastebin.com/zF6w7xJ6

I do not know how to fix those NotifyEmail errors. But they seem to be important.

I used "pip install TracAccountManager" to install the trac accountmanager plugin. It went fine. It did not warn about any missing dependencies. But could there be something missing anyway?

[versat]

I have no experience with Trac or so that could help.
I found this ticket which looks related: https://trac-hacks.org/ticket/13606

[Daniel Marjamäki]

I compiled 0.6dev of accountmanager ... and now I can login.

[Daniel Marjamäki]

I will look at https now...

[Daniel Marjamäki]

I think that it works now.. feel free to start using trac now and report to me if you see problems.

[versat]

Https and logging in works.
It then says i need to verify my Email address, otherwise the permissions are limited.
It says that a link with a token has been sent to my correct Email address, but i do not receive any such Email (also not in the spam folder or so)

[Daniel Marjamäki]

hmm.. thanks for the info

[Daniel Marjamäki]

It then says i need to verify my Email address, otherwise the permissions are limited.

I don't know why that happened. Your account looks fine in the admin view. amai managed to login without problems.

If anybody else has this problem let me know! I can then give you the verification token if that helps.

[rikard]

I have the same problem.

[Daniel Marjamäki]

Try this verification token: 4XRTK9-B

[rikard]

That worked, thanks.

[Xiche]

I'm also having this issue - just noticed when I went to enter a new ticket today.

[Daniel Marjamäki]

xiche: Try this verification token: NOUlXP8h

If anybody else has this problem ... feel free to contact me in the chat or via email.

[Xiche]

Worked for me. Thanks!

[Steve Albright]

Same limited permissions issues, not recieving any emails.

This is CleanCode, please get me a token or fix this.

Thanks

[Steve Albright]

false postive - redendantIntialization on val but val isn't set by loop until after first execution

{{{
TEST(LETSSEE, WhatIsTheValue)
{
const int count = 4;
int val = 16;

for(int i = 0; i < count; val = i++)
{
qDebug() << "Val = " << val << " i = " << i;
}
}
}}}

Val = 16 i = 0
Val = 0 i = 1
Val = 1 i = 2
Val = 2 i = 3

[versat]

I am not able to reproduce this false positive with 1.90 dev:
I have slightly changed the code so g++ accepts the syntax:

#include <iostream>

void TEST()
{
    const int count = 4;
    int val = 16;

    for(int i = 0; i < count; val = i++)
    {
        std::cout << "Val = " << val << " i = " << i;
    }
}

Output:

$ g++ -fsyntax-only fp_redundantInitialization.cpp && ./cppcheck --enable=style --inconclusive fp_redundantInitialization.cpp
Checking fp_redundantInitialization.cpp ...

Even with your original code i do not get a message.

[Steve Albright]

OK, I found the trick

void ExampleFunction()
{
unsigned int numPoints = 10; // this is required
unsigned int pointAIndex = numPoints - 1;

for(unsigned int pointBIndex = 0; pointBIndex < numPoints; pointAIndex = pointBIndex++)
{
}
}

style: redundantInitialization - Redundant initialization for 'pointAIndex'. The initialized value is overwritten before it is read.

[Steve Albright]

now that I have permissions again, created https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/9420 for this one.

[Steve Albright]

Still waiting to get access back to trac server too.

[Daniel Marjamäki]

try verification token XIGOIooD