confusing message about skipping standard includes

[Richard Lewis]

$ cat foo.c
#include <stdio.h>
void main(void){}

$ cppcheck --enable=all foo.c
nofile:0:0: information: Cppcheck cannot find all the include files (use --check-config for details) [missingIncludeSystem]

this is a really confusing 'error' message - it says it "cannot find" the include file, and suggests that it is "missing" but this seems to be wrong - i gather that it really means that it did not check the file listed in #include. Could you make the error clearer by changing the text to say

nofile:0:0: information: Cppcheck does not check included files by
default (use --check-config for details) [skippedIncludeSystem]

(or even just changing the text before [missingIncludeSystem] would make life easier for the user)

Similarly,

$ cppcheck --enable=all foo.c  --check-config
/tmp/foo.c:1:0: information: Include file: <stdio.h> not found. Please note: Cppcheck does not need standard library headers to get proper results. [missingIncludeSystem]

is also quite confusing - it's clearly not the case that stdio was "not found"

Couldyou make this one say

/tmp/foo.c:1:0: information: Include file: <stdio.h> not checked.
Please note: Cppcheck does not need to check standard library headers to get proper results. [skippedIncludeSystem]</stdio.h>

[Oliver Stöneberg]

Yes, the wording and handling needs to be reworked a bit. It is just misleading and noisy right now. I have not looked into it so far.