Re: [maildropl] Suggestion for improving maildropex(7)

[Sam V. <mr...@co...>]

Reuben Thomas writes:

> Those of suspicious mind (like me) would be reassured to know that,
> unlike formail -D, reformail -D does its own locking on the cache
> file, so doesn't need special treatment, and hence the maildropex(7)
> example for how to use it is indeed valid, and not the sort of
> simplified but imperfect example one often finds in such man pages.
>
> At least, that's my reading of reformail.C.

Correct. It uses a lock. I'll make a mention of that in the man pages.