Re: [Corelinux-public] String Analysis, Design, Implementation open

[Frank V. C. <fr...@co...>]

Joe Nelson wrote:
> 
> > Unlike the patterns I have been working on, this one has some work to
> > do. Even if no one wants to grab the Analysis bull by the horns, we
> > should at least be discussing aspects of this like the detailed use
> > cases, like the std::basic_string interface where the type can be
> > ignored. I think this is a good chance to flex some of MagicDraw UML as
> > well once we enumerate the use cases.
> 
> How about making all strings be unicode?
> 

Thats why we thought that a String abstraction would be useful, and
anyone wanting Unicode or Utf and still use whatever we have could just
adapt the string of choice to the CoreLinux++ string.

This keeps us from being tied to a particular implementation (see
Adapter or Bridge) and being flexible enough so we don't tie the
developer down either.

-- 
Frank V. Castellucci