Re: [Corelinux-public] String Analysis, Design, Implementation open

[Joe N. <3ne...@pr...>]

> If we just use Unicode then we either have to use another library, or
> create one. What we originally proposed was to abstract the interface
> and then provide some means to let users (developers) adapt another
> string implementation to our interface. This is more complex but allows
> 
> 1. For CoreLinux++ we can implement classes that use the String
> abstraction. This way we are confident (as much as can be) that the
> developers choice of string implementation won't break us (see Adapter).
> 
> 2. String implementations that haven't been developed yet to be use
> later on (ditto Adapter).
> 
> 3. Dynamic string changes in some cases (see Bridge).

So corelinux++ is only aiming to be an interface, rather than provide
any implementations?

--Joe