Re: [Contiki-developers] STM32W

[Joakim E. <jo...@si...>]

Hello Konstantin!

I think that the STM32W will be more used when the 16KB RAM version
is more generally available! I am just making my first tests with
the RF Control Kit so I am very interested in your patches ;-)



Best regards,
-- Joakim Eriksson, SICS

Konstantin Klubnichkin skrev 2012-02-10 14:08:
> Hello all!
>
> I've solved my "development" issues so now I'm able to compile and flash
> Contiki into MBxxx series of evaluation boards with stm32w108 chip.
> At the moment I've found some bugs in the original stm32w code, and I
> would say I don't agree with the approach "one port for MB851 and
> another for all other boards".
>
> It means that the code for all boards is compiled into final binary, and
> software onboard (not the developer during compilation) detects on the
> fly the board type and initializes data structures.
> For example, in my case, the software tried to initialize the
> temperature and acceleration sensors that are not present in MB951.
>
> As far as I understand STM32W is not the widest used chip, so there are
> not so many Contiki fellows using it, but anyway, should I fix the bugs
> and follow the original approach, or make separate ports for the
> different boards? Also should I share my changes with the community, and
> what is the right way to do it?
> Thanks!
> --
> Best regards,
> Konstantin Klubnichkin
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Virtualization&  Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
> Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
> also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Contiki-developers mailing list
> Con...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/contiki-developers