Re: [Configobj-develop] Improved list syntax

[Michael F. <fuz...@vo...>]

On 05/01/2011 18:48, Stefan Parviainen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Michael Foord<fuz...@vo...>  wrote:
>>> I created a clone of ConfigObj on Google Code
>>> (http://code.google.com/r/pafcu-configobj/) where I will put any fixes
>>> and improvements to ConfigObj and Validator that I can come up with.
>> Cool. When you're happy with what you've done could you create an issue
>> on the configobj issue tracker and attach a patch please.
> Personally I prefer the distributed workflow most projects seem to be
> switching to:
> "Because mercurial is a distributed (peer-to-peer) version control
> system, it excels at branching and merging. If the project maintainers
> like the new code, they just "pull" the changesets from the clone and
> merge them into an official project repository. It's all much more
> elegant than emailing patches back and forth, anonymous contributors
> get to use the same tools as core developers." (From the Google Code
> Docs). But I guess patches to the issue tracker is OK too.
>
> I'm pretty happy with the lists now (it was a pretty minor thing to
> fix) and I also fixed issues #20, #24, #25, and #27 (added tests for
> these + fixed some of the old tests). I'll see when I have time to put
> together some patches. In the meantime anyone who wants to test this
> can just pull the changes from my repository.
>
Ok, I can pull the changes from your repo instead of needing patches. 
Can you add a note to the relevant issues with the project / repo url. 
That will help when I come to look through the issues.

Many thanks,

Michael Foord

-- 
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/

May you do good and not evil
May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others
May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
-- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html