Re: [Configobj-develop] Improved list syntax

[Stefan P. <pa...@ik...>]

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Michael Foord <fuz...@vo...> wrote:
>> I created a clone of ConfigObj on Google Code
>> (http://code.google.com/r/pafcu-configobj/) where I will put any fixes
>> and improvements to ConfigObj and Validator that I can come up with.
> Cool. When you're happy with what you've done could you create an issue
> on the configobj issue tracker and attach a patch please.

Personally I prefer the distributed workflow most projects seem to be
switching to:
"Because mercurial is a distributed (peer-to-peer) version control
system, it excels at branching and merging. If the project maintainers
like the new code, they just "pull" the changesets from the clone and
merge them into an official project repository. It's all much more
elegant than emailing patches back and forth, anonymous contributors
get to use the same tools as core developers." (From the Google Code
Docs). But I guess patches to the issue tracker is OK too.

I'm pretty happy with the lists now (it was a pretty minor thing to
fix) and I also fixed issues #20, #24, #25, and #27 (added tests for
these + fixed some of the old tests). I'll see when I have time to put
together some patches. In the meantime anyone who wants to test this
can just pull the changes from my repository.

-- 
Stefan Parviainen