|
From: Jason B. <jb...@ze...> - 2010-03-18 17:47:08
|
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:20 AM, David Hostetler <neg...@gm...>wrote: > Or do you mean that you want even the crazy unanticipated stuff to get > automatic fall-through interpolation-style defaulting? In which > case, yeah, the validation approach isn't suitable, because the > interpolation reference has to be represented in the spec. > > -David > > It's this. :-) |