Re: [Collective-versioning] Re: CMFEditions branch_M7R2 snags

[Vincenzo Di S. <vin...@re...>]

On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 19:55 +0100, Alexander Limi wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 19:45:29 +0100, Vincenzo Di Somma <vin...@re...=
> =20
> wrote:
>=20
> > Hi all,
> >> Again, this is not something that is in LinguaPlone, nor is it somethi=
ng
> >> that CMFEditions should care about. This is a workflow task, and if yo=
u
> >> start mixing this into the core of every product, you will end up with=
 a
> >> mess.
> >
> > As we said many times, it is not obvious that the workflow is in charge
> > of managing the translations. The Oxfam project has complete different
> > requirements, and it is not due to a wrong design it just the way they
> > work.
>=20
> And as we've stated many times, we disagree on this. ;)
>=20
> I just wanted to show that it carries extra baggage that in this case =20
> influenced CMFEditions in a bad way. I've made my point, and won't do any=
 =20
> more ranting about this. :^)

Please do it ! :)
Your feedback is very appreciated, we would like to develop a tool that
could be use by the largest base of companies possible, so sharing ideas
and use cases is very important.

We have many problems of interaction with other tools, like Archetypes,
your LinguaPlone, GRUF etc etc.

Probably we should start writing down a list of interaction points and
find out the best way to mange them.

	vds