Re: [Collective-versioning] new interfaces in interfaces/IVersionTool

[Alberto B. <al...@me...>]

Il giorno mar, 26-10-2004 alle 19:28 +0200, Gr=E9goire Weber ha scritto:
> Hi All,
> hi Alberto,
>=20
> I'll have a look at it tomorrow evening or tuesday morning.
>=20
> I worked on the interfaces in the evening of my departure from
> Italy and like to propose some severe naming changes. I didn't commit=20
> them because I wanted first discuss the new naming scheme and also
> because I didn't have time to change all the names throughout the
> whole code.
>=20
eh, I have started getting rid of branches on train ;-), but i have yet
to checkin changes too

> Lets take my name changes as proposal. I'd like to rename things but=20
> these changes are not prio 1 in short term.
>=20
> The most important change in my eye is to change IVersioning to=20
> IRepository as 'versioning' doesn't really say anything concrete
> to me.

Your name changes seems good to me!
If you agree, we can first reach the state of a first working (even if a
bit inelegant and dirty) release to be delivered for friday (i hope
friday at the end of the day :-)), and then take as target a generalized
refactoring and inclusion in CMFEditions of a simpler ZVC.

my mantra is always  "first make it work, then make it well, then make
it fast"

what i plan to do really is:

- gerelaized polishing;

- merging of zvc and version tool;

- add the ability to hook on how an object gets "cloned";

- moving out of the version tool all the fixup things in another one;

what do you all think?


from the speed point of view, all through zvc len(<a_OOBTree_instance>)
is used to get histories bonduaries, in stress situation that can be a
slowdown point.... whe need (in the future) use an external class for
take care of lengths...
=20