Re: [coLinux-users] colinux 0.6.2 with pcap (snapshot coLinux-200 40710)

[gboutwel <gbo...@pr...>]

da...@co... wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 03:48:04AM +0100, peter green wrote:

> > that could break stuff a lot for exsiting users

> > what about checking for an exact match first and then going
in

> for the substring matching if there are no exact matches?

> 

> Right. That's better.



  Doesn't this apply to TAP too?  Last I looked they code and
the matching is basically the same.  Why hasn't this come up
with TAP?  If it has, how was it solved for TAP?  If not, then
I should probably make the same fix for TAP.



  Anyways, I was thing that instead of breaking out of the loop
when I find an partial match, I'd keep going through the loop,
checking each item with an full string match, if that is sucessfull
then over-ride the partial match that's found, otherwise go with
the first partial match.  Basically, it'd go with the first partial,
unless an exact match was found.  And it'd only go through the
loop once, instead of twice.



George



--------------------------------------

Want to download some Christian Stuff?

http://www.praize.com/downloads/