You can subscribe to this list here.
2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(100) |
Jun
(134) |
Jul
(149) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(185) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(59) |
Dec
(127) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005 |
Jan
(128) |
Feb
(233) |
Mar
(210) |
Apr
(196) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(96) |
Jul
(76) |
Aug
(149) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(78) |
Nov
(121) |
Dec
(82) |
2006 |
Jan
(249) |
Feb
(181) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(156) |
May
(128) |
Jun
(102) |
Jul
(157) |
Aug
(80) |
Sep
(42) |
Oct
(49) |
Nov
(36) |
Dec
(42) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(38) |
Mar
(45) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(40) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(16) |
2008 |
Jan
(52) |
Feb
(49) |
Mar
(90) |
Apr
(80) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(82) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(17) |
2009 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(16) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(1) |
2010 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(22) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(38) |
Sep
(46) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(5) |
2011 |
Jan
(21) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
|
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(19) |
2012 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2013 |
Jan
(27) |
Feb
|
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(14) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(7) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(25) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2024 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Miller, S. <sha...@yr...> - 2010-10-23 19:28:32
|
Good day to All, coLinux is very nice. I'm interested in the possibility of utilizing it in an environment without the Win32 subsystem. This would be an environment with little more than the NT kernel, network, block and other NT drivers. Since the various coLinux daemons and network-controlling applications are Win32 executables, I'm wondering if there's any chance at all that their functions could run solely in a "native" environment without the Win32 subsystem available. There needn't be any user interface at all; the idea is for a "headless" Windows with coLinux facilitating a Linux and making that Linux available on the network. Does this seem remotely possible? Thank you for your time, and for coLinux! - Shao Miller |
From: Hiroki H. <x1...@gm...> - 2010-10-23 03:35:48
|
Hello. I happened to find version 0.8.0.1370 of colinux-daemon.exe in Portable_Ubuntu_TRES.exe but I can only find version 0.7.8.1505 of colinux-daemon.exe in devel-coLinux-20100727.exe. Where is coLinux-0.8.0? Thank you. Hiroki Horiuchi |
From: Henry N. <hen...@ar...> - 2010-10-21 21:41:10
|
On 02.10.2010 22:59, Christopher Galm wrote: > Hi, > i'm using colinux for about two months. For now I've set up colinux > 0.7.8 (20100915) with a mandriva (spring 2010 32-bit) system with lvm > and xfs for disk management and samba/ftp for making files available in > windows. At first I used a tap-device as network interface. Now I'm > using the ndis-bridge with a MS loopback interface (static IP). > However, file transfer speed seems to be limited to 100 mbps (~11-13 > MB/s). Native disk transfer is (was) at least about 44 MB/s (tested with > TeraCopy). My CPU is an Intel Q8200 (Quad, @2,3Ghz) and shouldn't be the > bootleneck (although cpu-usage is about 80% on CPU0 - Samba and > ndis-bridge?). I've tested this under Windows XP Home SP3 and Vista > Ultimate SP2, both running colinux as user (cmd-line) and as service. > Transfer speed stays the same. Is there a way to boost up network > performance to 1000 mbps? (Or is there another (fast) solution for > making files available in windows?) Network has no limits, and ndis-bridge is the fastest way. If you use raw partition of your filesystem (like cobd0=\Device\Harddisk0\Partition3), then Windows does not cache this. So, it can be slower as in native Linux. Use "setcobd=async" to enable asynchronous mode for cobd devices. Or, use scsi devices instead cobd/hda. Scsi driver works asynchronous per default. For example "scsi0=disk,\\.\PhysicalDrive0" for the first harddisk. Be carefully with this option! Don't mount any partition, that is mounted always under Windows (for example drive C:). -- Henry N. |
From: Ron A. <ra...@ho...> - 2010-10-21 14:46:22
|
Hello Henry, Thanks a lot for fix. I installed it, and will let it run for some time. On average, the glitch occurs every 4-5 days. I'll update you on results. Thanks again, Ron Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 02:26:49 +0200 Subject: Re: [coLinux-users] coLinux 30945 seconds leap mystery solved Hello Ron, many thanks for your work! A skip for negative glitches coded now. We simple ignore this time and wait for next call of this function. Please see SVN r1539: http://colinux.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/colinux?view=revision&revision=1539 This should fix the Bug#1780633. Binaries for devel version 0.7.9 have here: http://www.henrynestler.com/colinux/testing/devel-0.7.9/20101019-jiffies/ An update for released version 0.7.8 have here: http://www.henrynestler.com/colinux/testing/stable-0.7.8/20101019-jiffies/linux-stable-svn1528-jiffies-fix.zip Henry Am 10.10.2010 16:50, schrieb Ron Avriel: Hi, After analyzing several +30945 seconds leaps, using the coLinux debug version, I managed to solved the mystery. The root cause of the problem is a timer read hardware glitch. The glitch occurs when the 24th bit of the counter should overflow, but it doesn't. For example: Instead of reading 0x16242A000004, a value of 0x162429000004 was read. Instead of reading 0x13510E000005, a value of 0x13510D000005 was read. This causes an error of -4.68 seconds (for a 3579545 frequency). The code in callback_return_jiffies(), together with an inaccuracy in co_div64() causes some interesting results: The first time the glitch occurs the time leaps forward by 24 seconds. When subsequent glitches occur, time will leap forward by 30945 and 30956 seconds alternatively. The results can be verified with the simulation below. Problem resolution: It seems this clock reading problem is well known and there are several workaroun ds for it. For example see the the thread http://www.mail-archive.com/fre...@fr.../msg34826.html and http://support.microsoft.com/kb/274323 . In any case, I think that a simple check to verify that clock did not shift backward from previous read is a must. In addition, if the clock changed more than a threshold, then the clock should be read again in loop until below threshold. |
From: Hiroki H. <x1...@gm...> - 2010-10-20 07:24:57
|
Very sorry. The subject was bad. Regards, Hiroki Horiuchi. |
From: Hiroki H. <x1...@gm...> - 2010-10-20 07:15:00
|
mkcoimage command is usable only on Debian GNU/Linux host. The usage is mkcoimage lenny|squeeze|sid TARGET-HOSTNAME. It supposes, if TARGET-HOSTNAME is cx, that the host's /etc/hosts (or NIS hosts map) looks like ... 255.255.255.0 netmask 10.0.0.254 gw 10.0.0.33 ns0 10.0.0.34 ns1 10.0.0.28 cx 10.64.0.1 co-host 10.64.0.2 co-guest ... co-host has nothing to do with the host. It also supposes an http server is running on the host and its document root is /var/www. My coLinux config file is like kernel=vmlinux cobd0=../ext3/lenny.i386.ext3 cofs0=/opt/cofs root=/dev/cobd0 ro mem=1024 eth0=pcap-bridge eth1=tuntap Regards, Hiroki Horiuchi |
From: Hiroki H. <x1...@gm...> - 2010-10-20 06:20:07
|
Hello. I am using coLinux-0.7.8(.exe). I have Xming with no access control and pulseaudio with a proper access control running on Windows Vista Home Basic. I made ext3 images of Debian lenny and squeeze using debootstrap. More precisely, I prepared the images with programs written by me. These are downloadable from http://19290.net/mkcoimage.tar With lenny image, I can play C:\Windows\media\notify.wav with totem without problem but with squeeze image, the sound was clipped. With both lenny and squeeze image, I can play the .wav file with paplay without problem. What is wrong? Hiroki Horiuchi |
From: Henry N. <hen...@ar...> - 2010-10-20 00:26:58
|
Hello Ron, many thanks for your work! A skip for negative glitches coded now. We simple ignore this time and wait for next call of this function. Please see SVN r1539: http://colinux.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/colinux?view=revision&revision=1539 This should fix the Bug#1780633. Binaries for devel version 0.7.9 have here: http://www.henrynestler.com/colinux/testing/devel-0.7.9/20101019-jiffies/ An update for released version 0.7.8 have here: http://www.henrynestler.com/colinux/testing/stable-0.7.8/20101019-jiffies/linux-stable-svn1528-jiffies-fix.zip Henry Am 10.10.2010 16:50, schrieb Ron Avriel: > Hi, > > After analyzing several +30945 seconds leaps, using the coLinux debug > version, I managed to solved the mystery. > > The root cause of the problem is a timer read hardware glitch. > The glitch occurs when the 24th bit of the counter should overflow, > but it doesn't. > For example: > Instead of reading 0x16242A000004, a value of 0x162429000004 was read. > Instead of reading 0x13510E000005, a value of 0x13510D000005 was read. > > This causes an error of -4.68 seconds (for a 3579545 frequency). > The code in callback_return_jiffies(), together with an inaccuracy in > co_div64() causes some interesting results: > > The first time the glitch occurs the time leaps forward by 24 seconds. > When subsequent glitches occur, time will leap forward by 30945 and > 30956 seconds alternatively. > > The results can be verified with the simulation below. > > Problem resolution: > It seems this clock reading problem is well known and there are > several workaroun ds for it. > For example see the the thread > http://www.mail-archive.com/fre...@fr.../msg34826.html > and http://support.microsoft.com/kb/274323 . > In any case, I think that a simple check to verify that clock did not > shift backward from previous read is a must. > In addition, if the clock changed more than a threshold, then the > clock should be read again in loop until below threshold. |
From: Hiroki H. <x1...@gm...> - 2010-10-15 14:02:25
|
Josep Maria Antolín Segura wrote: > Simply execute the colinux-console-fltk or colinux-console-nt. Thank you very much! -- Hiroki Horiuchi |
From: Josep M. A. S. <ja...@pa...> - 2010-10-14 18:01:39
|
Yes there is. Simply execute the colinux-console-fltk or colinux-console-nt. These consoles connect automatically to the running colinux. -- Quoting Hiroki Horiuchi <x1...@gm...>: > Hello. > > I asked this question to the IRC yesterday, but before I see an answer, > my machine was shut down by accident. > > So please let me repeat the same question here. > > QUESTION: > Is there any way to access coLinux service's shell even if its network > setting is broken? > > I mean I want to access coLinux service's shell without relying on ssh. > > Regards, > > Hiroki Horiuchi > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports > standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. > Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great > experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-users mailing list > coL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-users > |
From: Hiroki H. <x1...@gm...> - 2010-10-14 10:20:16
|
Hello. I asked this question to the IRC yesterday, but before I see an answer, my machine was shut down by accident. So please let me repeat the same question here. QUESTION: Is there any way to access coLinux service's shell even if its network setting is broken? I mean I want to access coLinux service's shell without relying on ssh. Regards, Hiroki Horiuchi |
From: Eol_Hotline <eol...@ho...> - 2010-10-11 13:07:00
|
hi i found a very strange bug that take me 15 days to be isolated and reproduced. It was so strange that i was thinking it was a spyware or virus. but the bug still occure with a fresh windows XP fully scanned with antivirus and antispyware and antirootkit. well let me explain how it starts i use Colinux with usual servers running (Http, proftp, postfix, mySQL)... and i use firefox in my windowsXP Every time i start colinux, i notice that firefox hangs (menus and icons not displaying correctly, tabs in firefox not reacting when you click to change from a tab to another) After many many tests, i notice that this bug only occurs when i m running webmin 1.5.2 in my Fedora 10 Colinux VM. I have tested with other version of webmin (the 1.51 for example) and i never notice troubles. And if i start my Fedora10-Colinux with all services without starting webmin 1.52, firefox never hangs. And if i start my colinux with webmin-1.52 and use firefox 4.0B6 or firefox 3.52 , nothing happens. Ever most strange,is that this behaviour still happening when i start my colinux without any network config (no tuntap, no slirp... in colinux config file) and webmin1.52 running inside. it s a really strange interaction any suggestion ? thx |
From: Ron A. <ra...@ho...> - 2010-10-10 14:50:38
|
Hi, After analyzing several +30945 seconds leaps, using the coLinux debug version, I managed to solved the mystery. The root cause of the problem is a timer read hardware glitch. The glitch occurs when the 24th bit of the counter should overflow, but it doesn't. For example: Instead of reading 0x16242A000004, a value of 0x162429000004 was read. Instead of reading 0x13510E000005, a value of 0x13510D000005 was read. This causes an error of -4.68 seconds (for a 3579545 frequency). The code in callback_return_jiffies(), together with an inaccuracy in co_div64() causes some interesting results: The first time the glitch occurs the time leaps forward by 24 seconds. When subsequent glitches occur, time will leap forward by 30945 and 30956 seconds alternatively. The results can be verified with the simulation below. Problem resolution: It seems this clock reading problem is well known and there are several workarounds for it. For example see the the thread http://www.mail-archive.com/fre...@fr.../msg34826.html and http://support.microsoft.com/kb/274323 . In any case, I think that a simple check to verify that clock did not shift backward from previous read is a must. In addition, if the clock changed more than a threshold, then the clock should be read again in loop until below threshold. Code to simulate the time leap: void simulate() { unsigned long long correct_cur_timestamp, prev_timestamp; unsigned long long timestamp, freq, timestamp_diff, remainder; unsigned long jiffies; int loops = 0; freq = 3579545; /* * dummy initial value */ correct_cur_timestamp = 0x12345678; prev_timestamp = correct_cur_timestamp - (freq/100); remainder = 0; while(1) { if ((++loops % 100000) == 0) { printf("Simulating glitch. loops: %ld\n", loops); timestamp = correct_cur_timestamp - 0x01000000; } else { timestamp = correct_cur_timestamp; } timestamp_diff = remainder; timestamp_diff += 100 * (timestamp - prev_timestamp); /* HZ value */ jiffies = co_div64(timestamp_diff, freq); if (jiffies > 1) { printf("timestamp new=%lu %lx%08lxh old=%lu %lx%08lxh rem=%lu %lx%08lxh\n", (unsigned long)timestamp, (unsigned long)(timestamp>>32), (unsigned long)timestamp, (unsigned long)prev_timestamp, (unsigned long)(prev_timestamp>>32), (unsigned long)prev_timestamp, (unsigned long)remainder, (unsigned long)(remainder>>32), (unsigned long)remainder); printf("jiffies=%ld, diff=%ld %lx%08lxh freq=%ld %lx%08lxh\n", jiffies, (unsigned long)timestamp_diff, (unsigned long)(timestamp_diff>>32), (unsigned long)timestamp_diff, (unsigned long)freq, (unsigned long)(freq>>32), (unsigned long)freq); } remainder = timestamp_diff - (jiffies * freq); prev_timestamp = timestamp; /* * Advance clock */ correct_cur_timestamp += (freq/100); } } Thanks, Ron |
From: Mike M. <mme...@na...> - 2010-10-05 14:53:49
|
On 01/-10/-28163 01:59 PM, Pavel Shirov wrote: >> How to dit it >> I meen how should the config file looks like? > > Do you mean booting colinux kernel under windows with real partition as root? > Pretty easy: > kernel=vmlinux > # This is the key - we mount real partition here > cobd0=\Device\Harddisk0\Partition2 > root=/dev/cobd0 > initrd="c:\gentoo\initrd.gz" > > And you should also have correct fstab entries. > > One thing to note is that if /dev/Xda2 has an LVM PV then you will need a kernel that supports LVM. A collection of specialized kernels with a handful of different combinations would be nice. Don't forget to build a Supreme Kernel with every thing on it. -- Mike Mestnik Technical Team ___ Nagios Enterprises, INC. Email: mme...@na... Web: www.nagios.com |
From: Pavel S. <ns...@gr...> - 2010-10-04 12:38:55
|
> How to dit it > I meen how should the config file looks like? Do you mean booting colinux kernel under windows with real partition as root? Pretty easy: kernel=vmlinux # This is the key - we mount real partition here cobd0=\Device\Harddisk0\Partition2 root=/dev/cobd0 initrd="c:\gentoo\initrd.gz" And you should also have correct fstab entries. |
From: mattias <mj...@mj...> - 2010-10-02 22:29:48
|
How to dit it I meen how should the config file looks like? |
From: Christopher G. <ch...@gm...> - 2010-10-02 20:59:33
|
Hi, i'm using colinux for about two months. For now I've set up colinux 0.7.8 (20100915) with a mandriva (spring 2010 32-bit) system with lvm and xfs for disk management and samba/ftp for making files available in windows. At first I used a tap-device as network interface. Now I'm using the ndis-bridge with a MS loopback interface (static IP). However, file transfer speed seems to be limited to 100 mbps (~11-13 MB/s). Native disk transfer is (was) at least about 44 MB/s (tested with TeraCopy). My CPU is an Intel Q8200 (Quad, @2,3Ghz) and shouldn't be the bootleneck (although cpu-usage is about 80% on CPU0 - Samba and ndis-bridge?). I've tested this under Windows XP Home SP3 and Vista Ultimate SP2, both running colinux as user (cmd-line) and as service. Transfer speed stays the same. Is there a way to boost up network performance to 1000 mbps? (Or is there another (fast) solution for making files available in windows?) |
From: mattias <mj...@mj...> - 2010-09-26 23:23:59
|
I rred in the litle manual colinux-daemon.txt i can mount cdroms But meens that i can install guests? If not way mount a cd Sorry my english |
From: H. N. <hen...@ar...> - 2010-09-26 21:08:42
|
Last tested kernel was 2.6.18. Kernel 2.6.19 is known as broken. For more recent kernels needs to change something. Mostly on the function prototypes and on the memory mapping. The very critical function is do_mmap_pgoff in the file http://colinux.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/colinux/branches/devel/src/colinux/os/linux/kernel/module/alloc.c?view=markup 64 bit host is not supported. Henry Paolo Minazzi wrote: > Some time ago (2 years ?) I was able to do it. > Remember that colinux on linux host is not tested very well. > I think it is only useful to do some test. > Paolo > > ????? ??????? wrote: > > I saw the mentions about running coLinux on Linux host in "RUNNING" > > and "/doc/building" files in coLinux distro. But when i start > > compiling coLinux for Linux Host i always got compiling errors. > > > > Any one run coLinux on Linux on modern distros virtualy? -- --------------------------------------------------------- ... Es folgt Arcor Werbung | Ads follows by Arcor ... Heute erleben, was morgen Trend wird - das kann man auf der IFA in Berlin. Oder auf arcor.de: Wir stellen Ihnen die wichtigsten News, Trends und Gadgets der IFA vor. Natürlich mit dabei: das brandneue IPTV-Angebot von Vodafone! Alles rund um die Internationale Funkausstellung in Berlin finden Sie hier: http://www.arcor.de/rd/footer.ifa2010 |
From: H. N. <hen...@ar...> - 2010-09-26 20:57:43
|
mattias wrote: > If i have mor an one tuntap how to use the other one? Syntax is: ethX=tuntap,<network connection name>,<MAC> Rename the tap-win32 into name without spaces and use the second option for the eth0=tuntap,"NameOfYourTap" Please read more in the text colinux-daemon.txt in your installations directory, or this file here: http://colinux.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/colinux/branches/stable/doc/colinux-daemon -- Henry --------------------------------------------------------- ... Es folgt Arcor Werbung | Ads follows by Arcor ... Heute erleben, was morgen Trend wird - das kann man auf der IFA in Berlin. Oder auf arcor.de: Wir stellen Ihnen die wichtigsten News, Trends und Gadgets der IFA vor. Natürlich mit dabei: das brandneue IPTV-Angebot von Vodafone! Alles rund um die Internationale Funkausstellung in Berlin finden Sie hier: http://www.arcor.de/rd/footer.ifa2010 |
From: H. N. <hen...@ar...> - 2010-09-26 20:51:55
|
mattias wrote: > NOW I RUN COLINUX I LIKE IT > BUT WHERE TO FIND A UBUNTU 10 IMAGE WITHOUT X I think, it does not exist. You can build it your self from a WUBI installation. Please read the step guide in wiki: http://colinux.wikia.com/wiki/Wubi -- Henry --------------------------------------------------------- ... Es folgt Arcor Werbung | Ads follows by Arcor ... Heute erleben, was morgen Trend wird - das kann man auf der IFA in Berlin. Oder auf arcor.de: Wir stellen Ihnen die wichtigsten News, Trends und Gadgets der IFA vor. Natürlich mit dabei: das brandneue IPTV-Angebot von Vodafone! Alles rund um die Internationale Funkausstellung in Berlin finden Sie hier: http://www.arcor.de/rd/footer.ifa2010 |
From: mattias <mj...@mj...> - 2010-09-26 17:10:11
|
If i have mor an one tuntap how to use the other one? |
From: mattias <mj...@mj...> - 2010-09-26 13:47:53
|
NOW I RUN COLINUX I LIKE IT BUT WHERE TO FIND A UBUNTU 10 IMAGE WITHOUT X |
From: Paolo M. <pao...@gm...> - 2010-09-26 12:48:41
|
Some time ago (2 years ?) I was able to do it. Remember that colinux on linux host is not tested very well. I think it is only useful to do some test. Paolo Борис Морозов wrote: > I saw the mentions about running coLinux on Linux host in "RUNNING" > and "/doc/building" files in coLinux distro. But when i start > compiling coLinux for Linux Host i always got compiling errors. > > Any one run coLinux on Linux on modern distros virtualy? > > Best Regards > > Boris Morozov > > 23.09.10, 01:23, "yin sun" <sun...@gm...>: > > I believe it is possible, at least I can see there are > code/configure in svn that handles that. > > /Yin > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Борис Морозов <um...@ya... > <mailto:um...@ya...>> wrote: > > Hello. It is posible to run coLinux on modern Linux distros > with kernel version >= 2.6.26 ? > > Best Regards > > Boris Morozov > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances > and start using them to simplify application deployment and > accelerate your shift to cloud computing. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-users mailing list > coL...@li... > <mailto:coL...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-users > > > > -- > Здесь спама нет http://mail.yandex.ru/nospam/sign > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances > and start using them to simplify application deployment and > accelerate your shift to cloud computing. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-users mailing list > coL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-users > |
From: Борис М. <um...@ya...> - 2010-09-26 01:11:19
|
<div><div>I saw the mentions about running coLinux on Linux host in "RUNNING" and "/doc/building" files in coLinux distro. But when i start compiling coLinux for Linux Host i always got compiling errors.</div><div> </div><div>Any one run coLinux on Linux on modern distros virtualy?</div></div><div> </div><div>Best Regards<br /><br />Boris Morozov</div><div> </div><div>23.09.10, 01:23, "yin sun" <sun...@gm...>:</div><blockquote style="border-left:1px solid #CCCCCC;margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;padding-left:1em;">I believe it is possible, at least I can see there are code/configure in svn that handles that.<div> </div><div>/Yin<br /><br /><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Борис Морозов <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:um...@ya...">um...@ya...</a>></span> wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Hello. It is posible to run coLinux on modern Linux distros with kernel version >= 2.6.26 ?<br /><br />Best Regards<br /><br />Boris Morozov<br /><br />------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances<br />and start using them to simplify application deployment and<br />accelerate your shift to cloud computing.<br /><a href="http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev" target="_blank">http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev</a><br />_______________________________________________<br />coLinux-users mailing list<br /><a href="mailto:coL...@li...">coL...@li...</a><br /><a href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-users" target="_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-users</a><br /></blockquote></div></div></blockquote><div><br /><br />-- <br />Здесь спама нет http://mail.yandex.ru/nospam/sign</div> |