I have found that Anders Eriksson 2.6.15 version it is quite cut on modules as SMBFS/CIFS and NFS is that because it woyld make it more unstable or I could try to recompile the kernel with that modules and keep it working on 0.6.4
I am using 0.6.4 beucase I have found it much more stable than 0.7.1, and it seems that using 2.6.15 instead of 2.6.11 does not make it more unstable.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I have been using for some hours the new kernel 2.6.15 ported by Anders Eriksson on Colinux 0.6.4 from:
http://www.henrynestler.com/colinux/testing/devel-2.6.15-hn/20060906/bin/
I have found that Anders Eriksson 2.6.15 version it is quite cut on modules as SMBFS/CIFS and NFS is that because it woyld make it more unstable or I could try to recompile the kernel with that modules and keep it working on 0.6.4
I am using 0.6.4 beucase I have found it much more stable than 0.7.1, and it seems that using 2.6.15 instead of 2.6.11 does not make it more unstable.
That link seems to be broken. Is this hosted elsewhere?
I am having trouble with udev on 2.6.12 that was part of the 0.7.1 package, and I want to upgrade the kernel as mentioned on wiki for FC5.