Re: [Codenarc-developer] Can GetterMethodCouldBeProperty be extended to check static getter methods as well?

[Hamlet D'A. <ham...@gm...>]

Looks good to me!

--
Hamlet D'Arcy
ham...@gm...

On Jan 20, 2012 3:02 AM, "Chris Mair" <chr...@ea...> wrote:

> If a class defines a static getter method to return a constant, that could
> be replaced with a static property.****
>
> e.g.****
>
>                 static String getName() {****
>
>                                 ‘abc’****
>
>                 }****
>
> Could be replaced by:****
>
>                 static (final) name = ‘abc’****
>
> ** **
>
> So, I am inclined to extend *GetterMethodCouldBeProperty*  to check for
> static getter methods as well.****
>
> ** **
>
>
> http://codenarc.sourceforge.net/codenarc-rules-groovyism.html#GetterMethodCouldBeProperty
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Any objection?****
>
> ** **
>
> Chris****
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
> The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
> is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
> Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
> _______________________________________________
> Codenarc-developer mailing list
> Cod...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/codenarc-developer
>
>