Re: [Codenarc-user] GrailsStatelessService - bean properties and dependencies

[<chr...@we...>]

>> ignoring fields with "no initialized value" seems like a good idea to me. It should help with fields that are tied to Spring - injected or pulled in afterPropertiesSet(), etc.

I am just concerned about casting too wide a net (and missing true violations of statelessness). So, I would be inclined to only ignore "properties" declared with "def".

So, public/private/protected fields, or fields with specific types (e.g., String, int, MyClass) would still cause violations. Is that ok?


>> Spring 3.x also has this annotation called @Inject.

We could consider supporting that. We only check the name of the annotation ("Inject"), not the type, so in that case there would be no runtime dependency.

Chris