Re: [Codenarc-developer] FW: [ codenarc-Feature Requests-3392455 ] Ignore MethodName for all Spec method

[Hamlet D. <ham...@ca...>]

I bet that you can configure the rule to do this. 

Don't the tests all share a naming convention? 
Or are JUnit and Spock specs mixed together? 

If we do fix this... then I propose a new global rule property: 
  ignoreSubclasses = [pattern]

So we would ignore the rule based on if an entry in the extends/implements clause matches the regex. 

For instance: 
  ignoreSubclasses = (Specification|*.TestCase)

It would be regex based, not type system based, because not all the classes are visible or on the classpath. 

Then we have a nice, global way to configure rules. 

--
Hamlet


----- Original Message -----
> Any thoughts on this issue?
> 
> It is fairly simple and straightforward to configure the MethodName
> rule (or any rule) to ignore classes by name or by filename or
> regex. I am hesitant to put framework-specific logic in generic
> rules, as suggested. But I guess we already do that so some extent
> by ignoring test classes (by default) for certain rules.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SourceForge.net [mailto:no...@so...]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 10:03 AM
> To: SourceForge.net
> Subject: [ codenarc-Feature Requests-3392455 ] Ignore MethodName for
> all Spec method
> 
> Feature Requests item #3392455, was opened at 2011-08-16 16:02
> Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by
> musketyr You can respond by visiting:
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126575&aid=3392455&group_id=250145
> 
> Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
> thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request,
> not just the latest update.
> Category: None
> Group: None
> Status: Open
> Priority: 5
> Private: No
> Submitted By: Vladimír Oraný (musketyr)
> Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
> Summary: Ignore MethodName for all Spec method
> 
> Initial Comment:
> As Spock is being more and more used among Groovy developers CodeNarc
> should not complain about nonstandard method name in classes
> extending directly or indirectly from spock.lang.Specification
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> You can respond by visiting:
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126575&aid=3392455&group_id=250145
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system,
> user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take
> the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the
> tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-d2d-2
> _______________________________________________
> Codenarc-developer mailing list
> Cod...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/codenarc-developer
>