Re: [Codenarc-user] implementing Cloneable

[Hamlet D. <ham...@ca...>]

When I do a "grails list-plugins" then I see this line: 

codenarc            <0.14>           --  CodeNarc plugin

So it should be up to date and ready to install. 


----- Original Message -----
> Great. Thanks.
> 
> 
> Waiting for this fixed CodeNarc to be available soon through its
> Grails plugin.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Hamlet DArcy < ham...@ca...
> > wrote:
> 
> 
> Yes, I checked the behavior. It does not give a warning for your code
> other than "UnnecessaryOverridingMethod". That is the one and only
> warning produced. It does not look at the return type of clone().
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > 
> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Hamlet DArcy <
> > ham...@ca...
> > > wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > CodeNarc 0.14 does not give a warning for your code. It does
> > however
> > give this warning:
> > 
> > line: 2 UnnecessaryOverridingMethod The method clone contains no
> > logic and can be safely deleted source: Dummy clone()
> > {super.clone()}
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > No, no. This error is obvious and irrelevant to my question, that's
> > why I was trying to keep it out of the discussion :-)
> > 
> > 
> > I am getting "CloneableWithoutClone" and my code defines a
> > covariant
> > clone() like below:
> > 
> > 
> > class Dummy implements Cloneable {
> > Dummy clone() {
> > super.clone()
> > // some more stuff
> > }
> > }
> > 
> > 
> > Can anyone please check the behavior in case of co-variant clone()?
> > 
> > --
> > Roshan
> > Blog: http://roshandawrani.wordpress.com/
> > Twitter: @roshandawrani
> > Skype: roshandawrani
> > 
> > 
> 
>