Re: [Codenarc-user] implementing Cloneable

[<ros...@gm...>]

No, it shouldn't, I think, but I wanted to see how it behaves there and wasn't able to know due to the bug in the currently released version.

Did you try it by the way? Because with CodeNarc Grails plugin 0.9, we are seeing CN warnings about such cloning, which is why I started trying it in the first place.

---------------------------------------------------
Sent from BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Hamlet DArcy <ham...@ca...>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 15:39:55 
To: Roshan Dawrani<ros...@gm...>
Cc: <cod...@li...>; René Scheibe<ren...@go...>
Subject: Re: [Codenarc-user] implementing Cloneable

It doesn't look at the return type.

Should it? It probably doesn't matter.


----- Original Message -----
>
> That sounds good, Rene. However, it stops me from trying what I
> originally wanted to try (since I am not on codenarc dev snapshot,
> but using it through Codenarc Grails plugin 0.9)
>
>
> My original intent was to see the CodeNarc behavior for covariant
> methods, i.e., if my code is:
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> class Dummy implements Cloneable {
> Dummy clone() {super.clone()}
> }
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Does CodeNarc like this covariant method or not is what I wanted to
> see. Would it possible for you to give a quick check?
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 6:47 PM, René Scheibe <
> ren...@go... > wrote:
>
>
> There is bug in v0.14. It's already fixed in the current development
> version
> (
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3317632&group_id=250145&atid=1126573
> ).
> It will be rolled out with the next release.
>
> Regards,
> René Scheibe
>
>
>
>
>
> On 07/04/2011 02:28 PM, Roshan Dawrani wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can someone help me see what is wrong in the following code:
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > class Dummy implements Cloneable {
> > Object clone() {
> > super.clone()
> > }
> > }
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > CodeNarc output shows and I can't figure out how to make it happy:
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > line: 1 CloneableWithoutClone The class Dummy implements Cloneable
> > but
> > does not define a proper clone() method source: class Dummy
> > implements
> > Cloneable {
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > --
> > Roshan
> > Blog: http://roshandawrani.wordpress.com/
> > Twitter: @roshandawrani < http://twitter.com/roshandawrani >
>
>
>
> > Skype: roshandawrani
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously
> > valuable.
> > Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance,
> > security
> > threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and
> > makes
> > sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> > Codenarc-user mailing list
> > Cod...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/codenarc-user
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously
> valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance,
> security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and
> makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
>_______________________________________________
> Codenarc-user mailing list
> Cod...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/codenarc-user
>
>
>
> --
> Roshan
> Blog: http://roshandawrani.wordpress.com/
> Twitter: @roshandawrani
> Skype: roshandawrani
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously
> valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance,
> security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and
> makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
>_______________________________________________
> Codenarc-user mailing list
> Cod...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/codenarc-user
>