Re: [Codenarc-user] implementing Cloneable

[Hamlet D. <ham...@ca...>]

It doesn't look at the return type. 

Should it? It probably doesn't matter. 


----- Original Message -----
> 
> That sounds good, Rene. However, it stops me from trying what I
> originally wanted to try (since I am not on codenarc dev snapshot,
> but using it through Codenarc Grails plugin 0.9)
> 
> 
> My original intent was to see the CodeNarc behavior for covariant
> methods, i.e., if my code is:
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> class Dummy implements Cloneable {
> Dummy clone() {super.clone()}
> }
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> Does CodeNarc like this covariant method or not is what I wanted to
> see. Would it possible for you to give a quick check?
> 
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 6:47 PM, René Scheibe <
> ren...@go... > wrote:
> 
> 
> There is bug in v0.14. It's already fixed in the current development
> version
> (
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3317632&group_id=250145&atid=1126573
> ).
> It will be rolled out with the next release.
> 
> Regards,
> René Scheibe
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 07/04/2011 02:28 PM, Roshan Dawrani wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Can someone help me see what is wrong in the following code:
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > class Dummy implements Cloneable {
> > Object clone() {
> > super.clone()
> > }
> > }
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > CodeNarc output shows and I can't figure out how to make it happy:
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > line: 1 CloneableWithoutClone The class Dummy implements Cloneable
> > but
> > does not define a proper clone() method source: class Dummy
> > implements
> > Cloneable {
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > --
> > Roshan
> > Blog: http://roshandawrani.wordpress.com/
> > Twitter: @roshandawrani < http://twitter.com/roshandawrani >
> 
> 
> 
> > Skype: roshandawrani
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously
> > valuable.
> > Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance,
> > security
> > threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and
> > makes
> > sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Codenarc-user mailing list
> > Cod...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/codenarc-user
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously
> valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance,
> security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and
> makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> _______________________________________________
> Codenarc-user mailing list
> Cod...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/codenarc-user
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Roshan
> Blog: http://roshandawrani.wordpress.com/
> Twitter: @roshandawrani
> Skype: roshandawrani
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously
> valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance,
> security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and
> makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> _______________________________________________
> Codenarc-user mailing list
> Cod...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/codenarc-user
>