Re: [Codenarc-user] implementing Cloneable

[Roshan D. <ros...@gm...>]

That sounds good, Rene. However, it stops me from trying what I originally
wanted to try (since I am not on codenarc dev snapshot, but using it through
Codenarc Grails plugin 0.9)

My original intent was to see the CodeNarc behavior for covariant methods,
i.e., if my code is:

----------------------------------------------------------
class Dummy implements Cloneable {
   Dummy clone() {super.clone()}
}
----------------------------------------------------------

Does CodeNarc like this covariant method or not is what I wanted to see.
Would it possible for you to give a quick check?

Thanks.

On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 6:47 PM, René Scheibe <ren...@go...>wrote:

> There is bug in v0.14. It's already fixed in the current development
> version
> (
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3317632&group_id=250145&atid=1126573
> ).
> It will be rolled out with the next release.
>
> Regards,
> René Scheibe
>
>
> On 07/04/2011 02:28 PM, Roshan Dawrani wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can someone help me see what is wrong in the following code:
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > class Dummy implements Cloneable {
> >     Object clone() {
> >         super.clone()
> >     }
> > }
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > CodeNarc output shows and I can't figure out how to make it happy:
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > line: 1 CloneableWithoutClone The class Dummy implements Cloneable but
> > does not define a proper clone() method source: class Dummy implements
> > Cloneable {
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > --
> > Roshan
> > Blog: http://roshandawrani.wordpress.com/
> > Twitter: @roshandawrani <http://twitter.com/roshandawrani>
> > Skype: roshandawrani
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously
> valuable.
> > Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
> > threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> > sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Codenarc-user mailing list
> > Cod...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/codenarc-user
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> _______________________________________________
> Codenarc-user mailing list
> Cod...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/codenarc-user
>



-- 
Roshan
Blog: http://roshandawrani.wordpress.com/
Twitter: @roshandawrani <http://twitter.com/roshandawrani>
Skype: roshandawrani