Re: [Codenarc-user] implementing Cloneable

[Hamlet D. <ham...@ca...>]

Interesting... if you add the public modifier, does it fix the error? All of our test cases have the public modifier in it, so this is a case we didn't test. 

We check for a clone method like this: 

ClassNode classNode = ... 
boolean hasMethod = classNode.getDeclaredMethod('clone', [] as Parameter[])


----- Original Message -----
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> Can someone help me see what is wrong in the following code:
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> class Dummy implements Cloneable {
> Object clone ( ) {
> super . clone ( )
> }
> }
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ​
> CodeNarc output shows and I can't figure out how to make it happy:
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> line: 1 CloneableWithoutClone The class Dummy implements Cloneable
> but does not define a proper clone() method source: class Dummy
> implements Cloneable {
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> --
> Roshan
> Blog: http://roshandawrani.wordpress.com/
> Twitter: @roshandawrani
> Skype: roshandawrani
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously
> valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance,
> security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and
> makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> _______________________________________________
> Codenarc-user mailing list
> Cod...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/codenarc-user
>