Re: [Codenarc-developer] Considering new "serializable" ruleset
Brought to you by:
chrismair
From: Hamlet D. <ham...@ca...> - 2011-06-06 05:30:10
|
It is fine as long as we're explicit in the release notes about it. ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > I am considering creating a new “serialization” ruleset, and > including these three rules: > > > > · SerialPersistentFields (0.14) > > · SerialVersionUID (0.11) > > · SerializableClassMustDefineSerialVersionUID (0.13) > > > > That implies moving the last two rules, which were released in > previous versions of CodeNarc. The SerialPersistentFields rule is > included in the upcoming 0.14 release. > > > > If I do that, I realize that might cause some (hopefully minor) > breakage for users that already configured the two existing rules > within the context of an included rulesets, but not if they are only > configured within “codenarc.properties” or as individual rules. > > > > Anyone have opinions on that, one way or another? > > > > Chris > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with > vRanger. > Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data > is safe, > secure and there when you need it. Discover what all the cheering's > about. > Get your free trial download today. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-dev2dev2 > _______________________________________________ > Codenarc-developer mailing list > Cod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/codenarc-developer > |