Re: [Codenarc-developer] InconsistentPropertySynchronization

[Hamlet D'A. <ham...@gm...>]

That is the intent of the rule.

It is so that someone doesn't see the value of a property in the
middle of a state change.



On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Chris Mair <chr...@ea...> wrote:
> Hamlet,
>
>
>
> Is the intent that InconsistentPropertySynchronization cause a violation if
> the class defines a synchronized getXXX() method but no matching setXXX()
> method or like-named property exists? I ran into a violation for that for a
> class at work.
>
>
>
> Chris



-- 
Hamlet D'Arcy
ham...@gm...