Re: [Codenarc-user] ExplicitCallToEqualsMethod and implementing equals method

[Chris M. <chr...@ea...>]

I agree. Can you please open a bug tracker issue for that? I think we can
and should ignore calls within an equals() method definition.

Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: René Scheibe [mailto:ren...@go...] 
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 3:33 PM
To: codenarc-user
Subject: [Codenarc-user] ExplicitCallToEqualsMethod and implementing equals
method

How is it possible to implement an equals method with the help of the
superclass' equals method?

@Override
boolean equals(Object that) {
    ...
    super.equals(that)
}

Shouldn't the ExplicitCallToEqualsMethod rule allow this?

Regards,
René Scheibe

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, you get
blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
Download your free trial now. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Codenarc-user mailing list
Cod...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/codenarc-user