Re: [Codenarc-user] ExplicitCallToAndMethodRule: allowing explicit "and" calls for various classes?

[Chris M. <chr...@ea...>]

>> Is it possible to allow explicit "and" calls on different classes in the
ExplicitCallToAndMethodRule?
>> doNotApplyToClassNames cannot be used because this filters only the
classes that are analyzed, not the ones, "and" is called on.
>> We are using Hamcrest a lot. It has a fluent interface which can go like
...

René,

Adding exceptions based on the class types that are the parameters would not
be practical, as you discovered, at least with the way CodeNarc currently
parses the source code.

As a workaround, I would just turn off the rule for all of your test
classes. e.g., 
    doNotApplyToClassNames = *Test,*Tests
or if you do not have a naming convention for your test classes, then use
doNotApplyToFileNames or doNotApplyToFilesMatching.

Chris