Re: [Codenarc-user] CodeNarc with Groovy 1.8

[Hamlet D'A. <ham...@gm...>]

The package rearrangement means that we just need to recompile the
product and re-deploy it. I estimate it would take only a few hours to
fix all the failing tests that 1.8 creates (I've already done the
research). But the bigger problem is that this means two Maven
artefacts: CodeNarc_for_Groovy_1_7 and CodeNarc_for_Groovy_1_8. That's
unfortunate because it is additional complexity in getting up and
running. One possible (but untested) alternative is to remove all
"assert" statements from the CodeNarc codebase. Then the ValueRecorder
incompatibility might never be triggered and we wouldn't need two
different deployments. I'll let Chris weigh in on this issue and see
what he things.

We currently have 23 new rules finished for the unreleased 0.14
version, plus a few defects that _must_ be fixed. I was hoping for an
end-of-May release after the GR8 conference.

-- 
Hamlet D'Arcy
ham...@gm...



On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 12:04 AM, René Scheibe
<ren...@go...> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to ask for the timeline to support Groovy 1.8?
>
> Currently CodeNarc 0.13 fails with Groovy 1.8 because some packages have
> been rearranged in Groovy.
>
> Groovy 1.7.10: org/codehaus/groovy/transform/powerassert/ValueRecorder
> Groovy 1.8.0:  org/codehaus/groovy/runtime/powerassert/ValueRecorder
>
> Regars,
> René Scheibe
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
> The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
> management toolset available today.  Delivers lowest initial
> acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
> _______________________________________________
> Codenarc-user mailing list
> Cod...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/codenarc-user
>