Re: [Codenarc-user] can I change the compiler phase my rule runs in?

[Hamlet D'A. <ham...@gm...>]

I am quite sure it is hardcoded as well. That's what I saw in the code :)

Can we make it an optional property on AbstractAstVisitorRule, like this:

class CouldReturnZeroLengthArrayRule extends AbstractAstVisitorRule {
    String name = 'CouldReturnZeroLengthArray'
    int priority = 2
    Class astVisitorClass = CouldReturnZeroLengthArrayAstVisitor
    CompilePhase phase = CompilePhase.CLASS_GENERATION
}

I could take a look at adding this feature if you want, but I'd rather
concentrate on writing new rules. Can you handle this?

-- 
Hamlet D'Arcy
ham...@gm...



On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:24 PM, <chr...@wa...> wrote:

>
> Hmmm. Not currently. That is hard-coded right now, I think. I'll take a
> look.
>
>
>
>  *"Hamlet D'Arcy" <ham...@gm...>*
>
> 10/22/2010 02:11 PM
>   To
> Cod...@li...
> cc
>   Subject
> [Codenarc-user] can I change the compiler phase my rule runs in?
>
>
>
>
> can I change the compiler phase my rule runs in?
>
> I need to see ReturnStatement objects and those are only present in
> the Class Generation phase.
>
> Can I make my rule run in that phase?
>
> --
> Hamlet D'Arcy
> ham...@gm...
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America
> contest
> Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in  U.S. and Canada
> $10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in
> marketing
> Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Codenarc-user mailing list
> Cod...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/codenarc-user
>
> ForwardSourceID:NT000CCCDE
>