Re: [Codenarc-developer] created a codenarc create-rule target

[<chr...@wa...>]

>> I really want it to parallel grails and griffon as much as possible.
>> So "codenarc create-rule" is the preference. However, the script to
>> execute is very, very simple. Perhaps we should rename "codenarc" to
>> "codenarc.groovy" and then provide a ./bin/codenarc and
>> ./bin/codenarc.bat. That sounds like overengineering though.

Agreed. I definitely want the syntax to be "codenarc create-rule", as 
well.
I'm hoping to get that syntax for both Windows and Unix. (I think there 
are
actually more Windows users than Unix users, though I can't be sure.)

If we rename "codenarc" to "codenarc.groovy", and then add a "codenarc" 
file
that just redirects to "codenarc.groovy" (for unix), would that be to much 

bloat?


>> My other idea was to make it a maven target. We're already pretty tied
>> to Maven. "mvn create-rule" might be good as well.

There are a bunch of non-Maven users (including me at work), so I would 
not want to introduce that dependency.

Chris