Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] cobolforgcc on AIX (RS6000)
Status: Pre-Alpha
Brought to you by:
timjosling
From: Tim J. <te...@me...> - 2001-02-22 04:29:47
|
Next time you send me an update I will make the change and send it back to you, which you should use as a base. I have a sec script to do it. No need to duplicate this. Regards, Tim Josling "Steven O. Ellis" wrote: > Tim, > > Am I to change each instance of INT32, UINT8, etc. as indicated below in > the STRING routine and it's testing routines? > > -Steven Ellis > > Tim Josling wrote: > > > > Curt, > > > > I have updated the cvs version changing all the int/char/float > > types to COB_*. So that means that > > > > INT32 -> COB_INT32 > > UINT8 -> COB_UINT8 > > ... etc > > size_t -> COB_SIZE_T > > > > If you really need char (eg for a parm to pass to str*, then use > > COB_CHAR. So > > > > char -> COB_CHAR > > > > This applies to all variables not just interfaces in header > > files. The reason is for 64 bit CPU compatibility. > > > > Tim Josling > > > > Curt Timmerman wrote: > > > > > > My first thought was to test for a previous definition but there is no guarantee the meaning would be the same. The 'COB_' sounds good. > > > > > > Curt > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Cobolforgcc-devel mailing list > > Cob...@li... > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cobolforgcc-devel > > -- > \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ > > _______________________________________________ > Cobolforgcc-devel mailing list > Cob...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cobolforgcc-devel |