Re: [Cobertura-devel] Piotr Tabor - Cobertura developer?

[Jim S. <ji...@ji...>]

A misunderstanding.

I wasn't suggesting that maven be required to use Cobertura, only that there 
be a maven plugin to run Cobertura, and that it be easy to set up.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ed Randall" <Ed.Randall@WallStreetSystems.com>
To: "Piotr Tabor" <pio...@gm...>; 
<cob...@li...>
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 4:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Cobertura-devel] Piotr Tabor - Cobertura developer?


> Please, don't change the build to require Maven!
>
> At the risk of starting a flame war - and I know there are many people
> out
> there who are using Maven with great success - but our experience was it
> is
> way too complicated and complete overkill for a build process!
> We tried to use it on our project a couple of years back, it was a
> disaster
> that wasted hours and hours of development time, in the end gave up and
> reverted to Ant.  Just doing the simplest things we had to use the
> maven-ant-plugin which made life twice as hard for no benefit.
>
> By all means *support* Maven, but please don't force it on those of us
> who
> don't want it when we occasionally need to build Cobertura.
>
> Thanks
>
> Ed
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Piotr Tabor [mailto:pio...@gm...]
>> Sent: 25 February 2010 06:30
>> To: cob...@li...
>> Subject: Re: [Cobertura-devel] Piotr Tabor - Cobertura developer?
>>
>> >
>> > By all means, please add him! And then ask him if he knows anything
> about
>> > Maven and/or Eclipse. We need plugins for both.
>> >
>> I was involved in Maven development a few years ago. As far as I know,
>> cobertura have quite good maven 2 plugin. For my own usage
>> I've patched the plugin two places:
>> * added goal to run integration-tests with cobertura
>> * added goal cobertura:web-flush that calls flush using servlet
> deployed
>> to application server.
>>
>> I would like consider moving build process and i-tests of Cobertura
> from
>> ant into Maven.
>>
>> Unfortunately I've no Eclipse-internals experience. I'm
>> netbeans-platform-certified-developer.
>>
>>
>> > It's sad--Cobertura is the most-accurate coverage tool I've ever
> used, but
>> > EMMA--which doesn't even do branch coverage--gets all the publicity
> because
>> > it's what's used for Android, and its Eclipse plugin is lightning
> fast and
>> > has basically zero insertion cost (tests run as fast with coverage
> as without).
>> >
>>
>> I'm nearly sure that my 1.10 version with re-factored instrumentation
> is
>> no-slower then Emma.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr Tabor
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
>> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cobertura-devel mailing list
>> Cob...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cobertura-devel
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Cobertura-devel mailing list
> Cob...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cobertura-devel