Menu

Choice of PocketSphinx or Sphinx 3

Help
Yong Yang
2010-02-03
2012-09-22
  • Yong Yang

    Yong Yang - 2010-02-03

    Hi all,
    I plan to use this excellent decoder for my chip in the mobile phone. However,
    I need to make a decision on which one is better.
    For PocketSphinx , it is faster at the cost of WER. Another point, it seems
    that it support semi-continuous mode only.
    For Sphinx3, it is bigger , also has a relatively lower WER. However, it 's
    slower.......

    I would like to apply the large vocabulary continuous speech
    recognition(LVCSR) on a single DSP processor, and only need to process
    decoding. Since training can be done on PC......
    Any idea for my case, all advices are
    welcome..........................Thanks!!!

     
  • Nickolay V. Shmyrev

    You can find related information on our website:

    http://cmusphinx.sourceforge.net/wordpress/versions/

    In short, use pocketsphinx.

    For PocketSphinx, it is faster at the cost of WER

    This is not true.

    it seems that it support semi-continuous mode only.

    This is not true either

     
  • Yong Yang

    Yong Yang - 2010-02-04

    Thanks, nshmyrev !
    Actually , I prefer pocketsphinx to sphinx3 personally.

     

Log in to post a comment.

Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.